A GameMaker user recently posted an interesting question in one of the communities that I watch:
So, I’ve known for a long time now how helpful it is to go through source code you haven’t written, just to pick up good habits, and generally understand how things work.
I got the source code for several games including Home and Ink from a Humble Bundle deal a while ago, and am just starting to take a look at them now. I’m finding it really difficult to get a grasp of what’s going on/which objects and scripts relate to what though – mainly because I’m having to switch between several windows of code.
Does anyone have tips about how to learn to understand GM projects? I usually have no problem understanding singular sections of code, it’s more getting to grips with how everything fits together, especially in full-length games. And generally, any tips about how you work through other people’s code.
This happened to be a very timely question, as I’ve recently been going through this myself.
I find it very enjoyable to code my own projects from scratch. I know what I’m trying to do, and I know why everything I put into the project is there. Especially when the project is something I’ve recently worked on.
It’s quite a different thing for me to try to look at a project that someone else has coded. I don’t know what the author was trying to do, or why they did anything they way they did it. Oftentimes the code is not well organized, and very frequently the code is done in a style very different from how I code, or the programmer’s approach is very different from my own, or they use math that I don’t understand well without explaining what they’re doing or why or how it works, and so on. This can make it very difficult to get anywhere.
It’s of course vitally important to be able to work with code that other people have developed unless you have no aspirations to be anything more than a solo coder for your entire life. But even if you never work with other people collaboratively, it can be very valuable to look at other people’s code and learn from it.
If the code is well-documented, this shouldn’t be too hard. I like to say it’s the original author’s responsibility to ensure that the code they write is easy to understand. But well-documented code is unfortunately rare. Documentation (ideally) tells you what you need to know in order to understand the code. How does the author know what you need to know to understand their code? No project can afford to be a 101-level tutorial for new programmers. People will come to the project code with all levels of knowledge and from many different backgrounds, and you can’t anticipate everyone’s needs. Nor should you have to — it should be expected that someone reading your code comes prepared. Working code is rarely intended to be a textbook example for neophytes. Most often, the programmer, if they document their code at all, documents it for themselves, and doesn’t care about anyone else’s needs if they should ever read the code.
So it’s quite understandable, it’s still all too common for code to not be well documented, or just not documented in a way that is useful to you.
Getting into big project that you didn’t author can be overwhelming.
What to do:
Before doing anything else, make sure the project builds and runs.
Play it for a while, and try to catch any runtime errors that may already be in the code. Don’t make any changes to the project until you’re satisfied that it is working. But recognize that there may still be bugs that are hidden more deeply than your playtesting was able to reveal. These may not be the fault of the programmer, either; it’s always possible that some update in GameMaker caused a bug.
It can be really frustrating to open an (unknown to you) already-broken project and make changes to it, then try to build it and find that it’s broken. The assumption will be that it’s your changes that broke the project, but if the bug was already there before hand, you’ll waste a lot of time focusing on your changes, not where the problem really is. So to avoid that, test the project first before you do anything else to it.
While you’re running the project, observe it and take note of any objects that seem important. Guess at what these might be called in the project, and look for them when you start exploring the project in the IDE.
Start with the first Room in the project.
Open it, and see what’s in there. In GameMaker, the project always starts with the first room in the resource tree. Start taking notes about what you find in this room. What objects are present in the room editor, or being created in code? These should be the first objects to examine.
Look at how resource groups are used.
The project may use folders to group things together, especially if it’s a large project. If the author used folders to organize their projects, this will give you some insight as to how the author thought about the project and its parts, and how they relate to each other.
Look for parent objects and see how they are organized.
The inheritance structure of objects will reveal a lot about how the game works. The game may have a lot of objects, but if the author organized them effectively, it’s likely that many of them are related to each other through inheritance, so you may have a comparatively smaller number of object families that you’ll need to familiarize yourself with, and understanding the family broadly will convey much of what is needed to be understood to understand the project as a whole.
Look for dead code and other resources that aren’t used.
It’s very common for developers to leave stuff in a project that never gets used at runtime. This is the “cutting room floor” of the project; it represents stuff the developer worked on for a little bit, but for whatever reason never finished and didn’t end up using. Sometimes there can be a lot of it. Identifying the dead code can be helpful because then you can ignore it, and focus on the live code. Once you’re sure the code isn’t used by the project, you may want to move it to a folder of dead code where it is out of the way and can be ignored, or just delete it from the project entirely.
There isn’t really an easy to way to identify dead code. But a few things to look for are code that is commented out, scripts that are never called anywhere in the project (use GMS’s “search in scripts” feature to find everywhere a script is called in the project.) Objects that are not present in any of the rooms, and are not referenced in code anywhere. Logical conditions that can never be satisfied can lead to dead code branches in if or switch statements, also, but these are a little harder to spot.
Look at scripts.
Scripts (often) support objects. Scripts are also (usually) well isolated and self-contained, so as to be reusable. Depending on the project’s size and the programming style, scripts may call other scripts. This can become difficult to follow if you have to jump between a bunch of different codefiles, but at least on your first pass this shouldn’t matter as much — just recognize that a script call is abstracting some detail, and you don’t necessarily need to get into the detail yet.
Look at objects.
First, scan the resource tree for objects that have sprites that you recognized from playing the game. Those are probably a good place to start.
Look at the player object(s), then enemies, and other things like terrain objects, weapons, pickups, or whatever. There may be some important objects that are invisible during gameplay and don’t have sprites. Look at the name for a clue about what the object is for.
As you get into each object in detail, probably the most important Events to understand are the Create, Step, Collision, and Draw events. Start there if the object has these Events defined, and take note of any other events it may use, and what it is doing in them.
You may find GML code, or you may find Drag-and-Drop actions, or a little of both.
As you start looking through the code, it’s going to be very tempting to make small changes, perhaps to conform to your ideas about code style and good practices. But try to resist the temptation to do too much of this at first. Even seemingly simple fixes can have consequences that you don’t realize. And you might find after “cleaning up” a bunch of code that it’s not needed at all, and can just be discarded.
The only thing you should really do on your very first pass through the code is leave comments. I like to prefix my comments with my initials, and what the comment is about: Question, reminder to do something later, explanation, bug, possible bug, etc. This helps me as I go through the whole project and find answers to the questions I initially had when I first started digging into the project. And my initials help me to keep straight whether the comment is mine or the original author’s.
As you review the project code, add comments with your notes, explaining where needed. Comments can be questions, eg “What’s this for?” or notes for things to do later (“This looks interesting, come back later and understand this fully.”
You can (and should) also take notes outside of the project. It depends a bit on the purpose — are you just looking at this project to learn from it, or are you working on the project to maintain or modify it? If you’re conducting a learning exercise, the notes should be the takeaway of what you learned by exploring the project files. If you’re actively working with the project, then the notes can be a guide to accumulate the understanding that you gained as you explored the project, a list of questions you still have, problems you intend to work on, bugs that need to be fixed, or other work to be done.
Focus on the interesting parts.
(The stuff you don’t yet know, but are interested to know/figure out.) Don’t worry about stuff you don’t understand, but aren’t interested in. Don’t worry about the stuff that’s simple/obvious to you.
Don’t assume perfection.
The programmer knew what they were doing. Well, maybe. Programmers make mistakes. Or do experiments. Or half-formed thoughts. Or just don’t know a better way to do something.
Code often has bugs. Code is usually sub-optimal.
As you take ownership of the project, you will need to start being the decision maker who knows what they’re doing. It’s easiest and best to carry forward with a good understanding of the previous author’s thinking, but it’s almost never available to us directly, and we have to infer it from what we do have.
If you’re new to programming and lack experience and are looking at advanced, complex code in a big project, it’s hard to do this. But start with small changes, test constantly, and build confidence as you learn and grow familiar.
Ask questions about the stuff you can’t figure out. Contact the author directly if you can, be respectful and appreciative if they’re open to talking about it, and understand if they’re not interested. If they’re not responsive, or you still have questions, take them to the GMC Forums. Lots of people are there who will take an interest and try to help. Find a friend who is willing and able to mentor you, or even work with you on the project.